Based on 1367 and 169 real audits
| Metric | Google Play app | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 37 | |
| Accessibility | 89 | 87 | |
| Best Practices | 84 | 85 | Google Play app |
| SEO | 90 | 93 | Google Play app |
| Security | 66 | 65 | |
| TTFB | 275ms | 230ms | Google Play app |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Google Play app |
Google Play app outperforms Facebook in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Facebook leads in performance, accessibility, security.
Choose Facebook when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Play app when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1367 audited Facebook sites and 169 audited Google Play app sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback