Based on 1417 and 3868 real audits
| Metric | Google Search Console | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 43 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 89 | 87 | |
| Best Practices | 84 | 85 | Google Search Console |
| SEO | 90 | 89 | |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 280ms | 345ms | |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Facebook outperforms Google Search Console in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Search Console leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1417 audited Facebook sites and 3868 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback