Skip to content

Facebook vs Nagich

Based on 1407 and 12 real audits

View Facebook details | View Nagich details
MetricFacebookNagichWinner
Performance3831Facebook
Accessibility8985Facebook
Best Practices8479Facebook
SEO9088Facebook
Security6766Facebook
TTFB280ms294msFacebook
Composite7273Nagich
Performance
Facebook
38
Nagich
31
Accessibility
Facebook
89
Nagich
85
Security
Facebook
67
Nagich
66
SEO
Facebook
90
Nagich
88
Composite
Facebook
72
Nagich
73

Facebook outperforms Nagich in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Nagich leads in composite score.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Nagich

Nagich doesn't clearly lead Facebook in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1407 audited Facebook sites and 12 audited Nagich sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Facebook or Nagich?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Facebook or Nagich?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Facebook or Nagich?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Facebook or Nagich?
Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Facebook or Nagich?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (280 ms vs 294 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Facebook or Nagich for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook scores higher on overall composite score while Facebook may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback