Skip to content

Facebook vs Open Graph

Based on 1465 and 4430 real audits

View Facebook details | View Open Graph details
MetricFacebookOpen GraphWinner
Performance3949Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8589Open Graph
SEO9093Open Graph
Security6770Open Graph
TTFB281ms430msFacebook
Composite7377Open Graph
Performance
Facebook
39
Open Graph
49
Accessibility
Facebook
89
Open Graph
89
Security
Facebook
67
Open Graph
70
SEO
Facebook
90
Open Graph
93
Composite
Facebook
73
Open Graph
77

Open Graph outperforms Facebook in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Facebook leads in TTFB.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1465 audited Facebook sites and 4430 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Facebook or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Facebook or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Facebook or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Facebook or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Facebook or Open Graph?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (281 ms vs 430 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Facebook or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Facebook may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback