Skip to content

Facebook vs Paper.js

Based on 1407 and 3 real audits

View Facebook details | View Paper.js details
MetricFacebookPaper.jsWinner
Performance3833Facebook
Accessibility8987Facebook
Best Practices8475Facebook
SEO9092Paper.js
Security6766Facebook
TTFB280ms347msFacebook
Composite7271Facebook
Performance
Facebook
38
Paper.js
33
Accessibility
Facebook
89
Paper.js
87
Security
Facebook
67
Paper.js
66
SEO
Facebook
90
Paper.js
92
Composite
Facebook
72
Paper.js
71

Facebook outperforms Paper.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Paper.js leads in SEO.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Paper.js

Choose Paper.js when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1407 audited Facebook sites and 3 audited Paper.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Facebook or Paper.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Facebook sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 33 on average).
Which has better security, Facebook or Paper.js?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Facebook or Paper.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Facebook or Paper.js?
Paper.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Facebook or Paper.js?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (280 ms vs 347 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Facebook or Paper.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Facebook scores higher on overall composite score while Facebook may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback