| Metric | Pushly | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 28 | |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 75 | |
| SEO | 90 | 87 | |
| Security | 67 | 64 | |
| TTFB | 280ms | 313ms | |
| Composite | 72 | 71 |
Facebook outperforms Pushly in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Pushly leads in no categories.
Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Pushly doesn't clearly lead Facebook in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1407 audited Facebook sites and 43 audited Pushly sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback