Skip to content

Facebook vs Roistat

Based on 1417 and 1 real audits

View Facebook details | View Roistat details
MetricFacebookRoistatWinner
Performance3859Roistat
Accessibility8971Facebook
Best Practices8481Facebook
SEO90100Roistat
Security6763Facebook
TTFB280ms671msFacebook
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Facebook
38
Roistat
59
Accessibility
Facebook
89
Roistat
71
Security
Facebook
67
Roistat
63
SEO
Facebook
90
Roistat
100
Composite
Facebook
73
Roistat
73

Facebook outperforms Roistat in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Roistat leads in performance, SEO.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Roistat

Choose Roistat when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1417 audited Facebook sites and 1 audited Roistat sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Facebook or Roistat?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Roistat sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (59 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Facebook or Roistat?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Facebook or Roistat?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Facebook or Roistat?
Roistat sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Facebook or Roistat?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (280 ms vs 671 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Facebook or Roistat for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Roistat scores higher on overall composite score while Facebook may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback