Based on 1465 and 3 real audits
| Metric | Smarter Click | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 41 | Smarter Click |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Smarter Click |
| Best Practices | 85 | 87 | Smarter Click |
| SEO | 90 | 97 | Smarter Click |
| Security | 67 | 69 | Smarter Click |
| TTFB | 281ms | 275ms | Smarter Click |
| Composite | 73 | 75 | Smarter Click |
Smarter Click outperforms Facebook in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Facebook leads in no categories.
Facebook doesn't clearly lead Smarter Click in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Smarter Click when your primary concern is SEO and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1465 audited Facebook sites and 3 audited Smarter Click sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback