| Metric | TDesign | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 25 | |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 84 | 77 | |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | TDesign |
| Security | 67 | 61 | |
| TTFB | 280ms | 47ms | TDesign |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | TDesign |
Facebook and TDesign are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Facebook has a composite score of 73 while TDesign scores 74.
Choose Facebook when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose TDesign when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1417 audited Facebook sites and 1 audited TDesign sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback