Based on 1 and 678 real audits
| Metric | FameThemes OnePress | Font Awesome | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 46 | Font Awesome |
| Accessibility | 88 | 86 | FameThemes OnePress |
| Best Practices | 96 | 88 | FameThemes OnePress |
| SEO | 85 | 91 | Font Awesome |
| Security | 81 | 67 | FameThemes OnePress |
| TTFB | 775ms | 480ms | Font Awesome |
| Composite | 80 | 74 | FameThemes OnePress |
FameThemes OnePress outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). Font Awesome leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.
Choose FameThemes OnePress when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited FameThemes OnePress sites and 678 audited Font Awesome sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback