Skip to content

FancyBox vs Google Analytics

Based on 116 and 2004 real audits

View FancyBox details | View Google Analytics details
MetricFancyBoxGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance5141FancyBox
Accessibility8287Google Analytics
Best Practices8986FancyBox
SEO9291FancyBox
Security6365Google Analytics
TTFB706ms413msGoogle Analytics
Composite7473FancyBox
Performance
FancyBox
51
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
FancyBox
82
Google Analytics
87
Security
FancyBox
63
Google Analytics
65
SEO
FancyBox
92
Google Analytics
91
Composite
FancyBox
74
Google Analytics
73

FancyBox outperforms Google Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.

When to choose FancyBox

Choose FancyBox when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 116 audited FancyBox sites and 2004 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, FancyBox sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
FancyBox sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FancyBox or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (413 ms vs 706 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FancyBox or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. FancyBox scores higher on overall composite score while FancyBox may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback