Skip to content

FancyBox vs Google Analytics

Based on 167 and 2532 real audits

View FancyBox details | View Google Analytics details
MetricFancyBoxGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance5143FancyBox
Accessibility8287Google Analytics
Best Practices8887FancyBox
SEO9292Tie
Security6868Tie
TTFB705ms466msGoogle Analytics
Composite7575Tie
Performance
FancyBox
51
Google Analytics
43
Accessibility
FancyBox
82
Google Analytics
87
Security
FancyBox
68
Google Analytics
68
SEO
FancyBox
92
Google Analytics
92
Composite
FancyBox
75
Google Analytics
75

FancyBox and Google Analytics are closely matched, each leading in different categories. FancyBox has a composite score of 75 while Google Analytics scores 75.

When to choose FancyBox

Choose FancyBox when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 167 audited FancyBox sites and 2532 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, FancyBox sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
FancyBox sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FancyBox or Google Analytics?
FancyBox sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FancyBox or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (466 ms vs 705 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FancyBox or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. FancyBox scores higher on overall composite score while FancyBox may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback