| Metric | Fast Bundle | Goober | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 34 | Goober |
| Accessibility | 96 | 89 | Fast Bundle |
| Best Practices | 81 | 82 | Goober |
| SEO | 100 | 91 | Fast Bundle |
| Security | 75 | 65 | Fast Bundle |
| TTFB | 101ms | 282ms | Fast Bundle |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Fast Bundle outperforms Goober in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Goober leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Fast Bundle when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Goober when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Fast Bundle sites and 140 audited Goober sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback