Skip to content

Fastly vs Flying Pages

Based on 383 and 1 real audits

MetricFastlyFlying PagesWinner
Performance4579Flying Pages
Accessibility9195Flying Pages
Best Practices89100Flying Pages
SEO92100Flying Pages
Security6668Flying Pages
TTFB149ms146msFlying Pages
Composite7480Flying Pages
Performance
Fastly
45
Flying Pages
79
Accessibility
Fastly
91
Flying Pages
95
Security
Fastly
66
Flying Pages
68
SEO
Fastly
92
Flying Pages
100
Composite
Fastly
74
Flying Pages
80

Flying Pages outperforms Fastly in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). Fastly leads in no categories.

When to choose Fastly

Fastly doesn't clearly lead Flying Pages in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Flying Pages

Choose Flying Pages when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 383 audited Fastly sites and 1 audited Flying Pages sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Fastly or Flying Pages?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (79 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Fastly or Flying Pages?
Flying Pages sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Fastly or Flying Pages?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Flying Pages (95 vs 91). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Fastly or Flying Pages?
Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Fastly or Flying Pages?
Flying Pages sites show lower Time to First Byte (146 ms vs 149 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Fastly or Flying Pages for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Flying Pages scores higher on overall composite score while Fastly may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback