Based on 376 and 29 real audits
| Metric | Fastly | GitHub Pages | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 76 | GitHub Pages |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | Fastly |
| Best Practices | 89 | 95 | GitHub Pages |
| SEO | 92 | 96 | GitHub Pages |
| Security | 66 | 64 | Fastly |
| TTFB | 148ms | 158ms | Fastly |
| Composite | 74 | 78 | GitHub Pages |
GitHub Pages outperforms Fastly in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). Fastly leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.
Choose Fastly when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose GitHub Pages when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 376 audited Fastly sites and 29 audited GitHub Pages sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback