Skip to content

Fastly vs Honeybadger

Based on 383 and 2 real audits

View Fastly details | View Honeybadger details
MetricFastlyHoneybadgerWinner
Performance4556Honeybadger
Accessibility9180Fastly
Best Practices89100Honeybadger
SEO9292Tie
Security6672Honeybadger
TTFB149ms40msHoneybadger
Composite7477Honeybadger
Performance
Fastly
45
Honeybadger
56
Accessibility
Fastly
91
Honeybadger
80
Security
Fastly
66
Honeybadger
72
SEO
Fastly
92
Honeybadger
92
Composite
Fastly
74
Honeybadger
77

Honeybadger outperforms Fastly in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Fastly leads in accessibility.

When to choose Fastly

Choose Fastly when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Honeybadger

Choose Honeybadger when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 383 audited Fastly sites and 2 audited Honeybadger sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Fastly or Honeybadger?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Honeybadger sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Fastly or Honeybadger?
Honeybadger sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Fastly or Honeybadger?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Fastly (91 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Fastly or Honeybadger?
Fastly sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Fastly or Honeybadger?
Honeybadger sites show lower Time to First Byte (40 ms vs 149 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Fastly or Honeybadger for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Honeybadger scores higher on overall composite score while Fastly may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback