Based on 4 and 3098 real audits
| Metric | FastSpring | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 54 | 43 | FastSpring |
| Accessibility | 80 | 88 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 93 | 87 | FastSpring |
| SEO | 84 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 61 | 65 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 346ms | 345ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms FastSpring in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). FastSpring leads in performance, best practices.
Choose FastSpring when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited FastSpring sites and 3098 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback