Skip to content

Fathom Analytics vs Open Graph

Based on 15 and 3415 real audits

View Fathom Analytics details | View Open Graph details
MetricFathom AnalyticsOpen GraphWinner
Performance6145Fathom Analytics
Accessibility8889Open Graph
Best Practices9487Fathom Analytics
SEO9792Fathom Analytics
Security6266Open Graph
TTFB247ms365msFathom Analytics
Composite7674Fathom Analytics
Performance
Fathom Analytics
61
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Fathom Analytics
88
Open Graph
89
Security
Fathom Analytics
62
Open Graph
66
SEO
Fathom Analytics
97
Open Graph
92
Composite
Fathom Analytics
76
Open Graph
74

Fathom Analytics outperforms Open Graph in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Open Graph leads in accessibility, security.

When to choose Fathom Analytics

Choose Fathom Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 15 audited Fathom Analytics sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Fathom Analytics or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Fathom Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (61 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Fathom Analytics or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Fathom Analytics or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Fathom Analytics or Open Graph?
Fathom Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (97 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Fathom Analytics or Open Graph?
Fathom Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (247 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Fathom Analytics or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Fathom Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Fathom Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback