Based on 15 and 1579 real audits
| Metric | Fathom Analytics | Priority Hints | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 61 | 42 | Fathom Analytics |
| Accessibility | 88 | 90 | Priority Hints |
| Best Practices | 94 | 87 | Fathom Analytics |
| SEO | 97 | 92 | Fathom Analytics |
| Security | 62 | 67 | Priority Hints |
| TTFB | 247ms | 319ms | Fathom Analytics |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Fathom Analytics |
Fathom Analytics outperforms Priority Hints in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Priority Hints leads in accessibility, security.
Choose Fathom Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Priority Hints when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 15 audited Fathom Analytics sites and 1579 audited Priority Hints sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback