Skip to content

Fathom vs Google Workspace

Based on 17 and 1764 real audits

View Fathom details | View Google Workspace details
MetricFathomGoogle WorkspaceWinner
Performance5845Fathom
Accessibility9088Fathom
Best Practices9287Fathom
SEO9790Fathom
Security6267Google Workspace
TTFB317ms282msGoogle Workspace
Composite7674Fathom
Performance
Fathom
58
Google Workspace
45
Accessibility
Fathom
90
Google Workspace
88
Security
Fathom
62
Google Workspace
67
SEO
Fathom
97
Google Workspace
90
Composite
Fathom
76
Google Workspace
74

Fathom outperforms Google Workspace in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Google Workspace leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose Fathom

Choose Fathom when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Workspace

Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 17 audited Fathom sites and 1764 audited Google Workspace sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Fathom or Google Workspace?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Fathom sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Fathom or Google Workspace?
Google Workspace sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Fathom or Google Workspace?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Fathom (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Fathom or Google Workspace?
Fathom sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (97 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Fathom or Google Workspace?
Google Workspace sites show lower Time to First Byte (282 ms vs 317 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Fathom or Google Workspace for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Fathom scores higher on overall composite score while Fathom may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback