Skip to content

Fathom vs jQuery

Based on 17 and 1857 real audits

View Fathom details | View jQuery details
MetricFathomjQueryWinner
Performance5845Fathom
Accessibility9086Fathom
Best Practices9287Fathom
SEO9790Fathom
Security6265jQuery
TTFB317ms438msFathom
Composite7673Fathom
Performance
Fathom
58
jQuery
45
Accessibility
Fathom
90
jQuery
86
Security
Fathom
62
jQuery
65
SEO
Fathom
97
jQuery
90
Composite
Fathom
76
jQuery
73

Fathom outperforms jQuery in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). jQuery leads in security.

When to choose Fathom

Choose Fathom when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose jQuery

Choose jQuery when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 17 audited Fathom sites and 1857 audited jQuery sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Fathom or jQuery?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Fathom sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Fathom or jQuery?
jQuery sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Fathom or jQuery?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Fathom (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Fathom or jQuery?
Fathom sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (97 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Fathom or jQuery?
Fathom sites show lower Time to First Byte (317 ms vs 438 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Fathom or jQuery for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Fathom scores higher on overall composite score while Fathom may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback