Based on 3 and 158 real audits
| Metric | Fedora | Google AdSense | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 84 | 42 | Fedora |
| Accessibility | 88 | 84 | Fedora |
| Best Practices | 98 | 85 | Fedora |
| SEO | 84 | 92 | Google AdSense |
| Security | 67 | 64 | Fedora |
| TTFB | 324ms | 382ms | Fedora |
| Composite | 76 | 73 | Fedora |
Fedora outperforms Google AdSense in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Google AdSense leads in SEO.
Choose Fedora when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google AdSense when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Fedora sites and 158 audited Google AdSense sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback