Based on 3 and 227 real audits
| Metric | Fedora | Google Domains | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 84 | 54 | Fedora |
| Accessibility | 88 | 90 | Google Domains |
| Best Practices | 98 | 94 | Fedora |
| SEO | 84 | 91 | Google Domains |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 324ms | 183ms | Google Domains |
| Composite | 76 | 75 | Fedora |
Fedora and Google Domains are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Fedora has a composite score of 76 while Google Domains scores 75.
Choose Fedora when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Domains when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Fedora sites and 227 audited Google Domains sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback