Skip to content

FingerprintJS vs Google Analytics

Based on 37 and 1905 real audits

View FingerprintJS details | View Google Analytics details
MetricFingerprintJSGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance2941Google Analytics
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices7985Google Analytics
SEO8991Google Analytics
Security6464Tie
TTFB302ms401msFingerprintJS
Composite7173Google Analytics
Performance
FingerprintJS
29
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
FingerprintJS
87
Google Analytics
87
Security
FingerprintJS
64
Google Analytics
64
SEO
FingerprintJS
89
Google Analytics
91
Composite
FingerprintJS
71
Google Analytics
73

Google Analytics outperforms FingerprintJS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). FingerprintJS leads in TTFB.

When to choose FingerprintJS

Choose FingerprintJS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 37 audited FingerprintJS sites and 1905 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, FingerprintJS or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, FingerprintJS or Google Analytics?
FingerprintJS sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FingerprintJS or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor FingerprintJS (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FingerprintJS or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FingerprintJS or Google Analytics?
FingerprintJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 401 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FingerprintJS or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while FingerprintJS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback