Skip to content

FingerprintJS vs Lozad.js

Based on 2 and 1 real audits

MetricFingerprintJSLozad.jsWinner
Performance4456Lozad.js
Accessibility9299Lozad.js
Best Practices88100Lozad.js
SEO100100Tie
Security6768Lozad.js
TTFB160ms209msFingerprintJS
Composite7574FingerprintJS
Performance
FingerprintJS
44
Lozad.js
56
Accessibility
FingerprintJS
92
Lozad.js
99
Security
FingerprintJS
67
Lozad.js
68
SEO
FingerprintJS
100
Lozad.js
100
Composite
FingerprintJS
75
Lozad.js
74

Lozad.js outperforms FingerprintJS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 75). FingerprintJS leads in TTFB, composite score.

FAQ

Which is faster, FingerprintJS or Lozad.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Lozad.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, FingerprintJS or Lozad.js?
Lozad.js sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Should I choose FingerprintJS or Lozad.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Lozad.js scores higher on performance while FingerprintJS may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback