Skip to content

FingerprintJS vs Microsoft

Based on 37 and 2421 real audits

View FingerprintJS details | View Microsoft details
MetricFingerprintJSMicrosoftWinner
Performance2939Microsoft
Accessibility8789Microsoft
Best Practices7986Microsoft
SEO8989Tie
Security6466Microsoft
TTFB302ms329msFingerprintJS
Composite7172Microsoft
Performance
FingerprintJS
29
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
FingerprintJS
87
Microsoft
89
Security
FingerprintJS
64
Microsoft
66
SEO
FingerprintJS
89
Microsoft
89
Composite
FingerprintJS
71
Microsoft
72

Microsoft outperforms FingerprintJS in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). FingerprintJS leads in TTFB.

When to choose FingerprintJS

Choose FingerprintJS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 37 audited FingerprintJS sites and 2421 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, FingerprintJS or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, FingerprintJS or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FingerprintJS or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FingerprintJS or Microsoft?
FingerprintJS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FingerprintJS or Microsoft?
FingerprintJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FingerprintJS or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while FingerprintJS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback