Skip to content

FingerprintJS vs Open Graph

Based on 37 and 3415 real audits

MetricFingerprintJSOpen GraphWinner
Performance2945Open Graph
Accessibility8789Open Graph
Best Practices7987Open Graph
SEO8992Open Graph
Security6466Open Graph
TTFB302ms365msFingerprintJS
Composite7174Open Graph
Performance
FingerprintJS
29
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
FingerprintJS
87
Open Graph
89
Security
FingerprintJS
64
Open Graph
66
SEO
FingerprintJS
89
Open Graph
92
Composite
FingerprintJS
71
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms FingerprintJS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). FingerprintJS leads in TTFB.

When to choose FingerprintJS

Choose FingerprintJS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 37 audited FingerprintJS sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, FingerprintJS or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 29 on average).
Which has better security, FingerprintJS or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, FingerprintJS or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, FingerprintJS or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), FingerprintJS or Open Graph?
FingerprintJS sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose FingerprintJS or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while FingerprintJS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback