Based on 4 and 349 real audits
| Metric | Finsweet | jsDelivr CDN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 38 | Finsweet |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | jsDelivr CDN |
| Best Practices | 92 | 86 | Finsweet |
| SEO | 95 | 91 | Finsweet |
| Security | 71 | 65 | Finsweet |
| TTFB | 276ms | 360ms | Finsweet |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Finsweet |
Finsweet outperforms jsDelivr CDN in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). jsDelivr CDN leads in accessibility.
Choose Finsweet when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose jsDelivr CDN when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 4 audited Finsweet sites and 349 audited jsDelivr CDN sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback