Based on 3 and 1 real audits
| Metric | FlippingBook | Fortinet FortiGate | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 35 | FlippingBook |
| Accessibility | 96 | 97 | Fortinet FortiGate |
| Best Practices | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| SEO | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 72 | 65 | FlippingBook |
| TTFB | 322ms | 262ms | Fortinet FortiGate |
| Composite | 78 | 73 | FlippingBook |
FlippingBook outperforms Fortinet FortiGate in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Fortinet FortiGate leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose FlippingBook when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Fortinet FortiGate when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited FlippingBook sites and 1 audited Fortinet FortiGate sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback