Based on 2 and 48 real audits
| Metric | Floating UI | Yandex.Metrika | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 44 | Floating UI |
| Accessibility | 91 | 72 | Floating UI |
| Best Practices | 73 | 87 | Yandex.Metrika |
| SEO | 85 | 90 | Yandex.Metrika |
| Security | 68 | 64 | Floating UI |
| TTFB | 276ms | 391ms | Floating UI |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Floating UI |
Floating UI outperforms Yandex.Metrika in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Yandex.Metrika leads in best practices, SEO.
Choose Floating UI when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Yandex.Metrika when your primary concern is best practices and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Floating UI sites and 48 audited Yandex.Metrika sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback