Based on 13 and 12 real audits
| Metric | Fly.io | Phoenix Framework | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 73 | 70 | Fly.io |
| Accessibility | 91 | 93 | Phoenix Framework |
| Best Practices | 97 | 97 | Tie |
| SEO | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Security | 77 | 81 | Phoenix Framework |
| TTFB | 1000ms | 1032ms | Fly.io |
| Composite | 82 | 84 | Phoenix Framework |
Phoenix Framework outperforms Fly.io in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (84 vs 82). Fly.io leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose Fly.io when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Phoenix Framework when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 13 audited Fly.io sites and 12 audited Phoenix Framework sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback