Skip to content

Flying Pages vs Google Analytics

Based on 5 and 2088 real audits

View Flying Pages details | View Google Analytics details
MetricFlying PagesGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance5642Flying Pages
Accessibility8687Google Analytics
Best Practices8986Flying Pages
SEO9491Flying Pages
Security7766Flying Pages
TTFB970ms421msGoogle Analytics
Composite8173Flying Pages
Performance
Flying Pages
56
Google Analytics
42
Accessibility
Flying Pages
86
Google Analytics
87
Security
Flying Pages
77
Google Analytics
66
SEO
Flying Pages
94
Google Analytics
91
Composite
Flying Pages
81
Google Analytics
73

Flying Pages outperforms Google Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Flying Pages

Choose Flying Pages when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 5 audited Flying Pages sites and 2088 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Flying Pages or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 42 on average).
Which has better security, Flying Pages or Google Analytics?
Flying Pages sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Flying Pages or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Analytics (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Flying Pages or Google Analytics?
Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Flying Pages or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (421 ms vs 970 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Flying Pages or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Flying Pages scores higher on overall composite score while Flying Pages may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback