Skip to content

Flying Pages vs HSTS

Based on 1 and 2599 real audits

View Flying Pages details | View HSTS details
MetricFlying PagesHSTSWinner
Performance7948Flying Pages
Accessibility9589Flying Pages
Best Practices10088Flying Pages
SEO10091Flying Pages
Security6870HSTS
TTFB146ms365msFlying Pages
Composite8075Flying Pages
Performance
Flying Pages
79
HSTS
48
Accessibility
Flying Pages
95
HSTS
89
Security
Flying Pages
68
HSTS
70
SEO
Flying Pages
100
HSTS
91
Composite
Flying Pages
80
HSTS
75

Flying Pages outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 75). HSTS leads in security.

When to choose Flying Pages

Choose Flying Pages when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Flying Pages sites and 2599 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Flying Pages or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (79 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, Flying Pages or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Flying Pages or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Flying Pages (95 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Flying Pages or HSTS?
Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Flying Pages or HSTS?
Flying Pages sites show lower Time to First Byte (146 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Flying Pages or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Flying Pages scores higher on overall composite score while Flying Pages may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback