Skip to content

Flying Pages vs WordPress

Based on 5 and 929 real audits

View Flying Pages details | View WordPress details
MetricFlying PagesWordPressWinner
Performance5648Flying Pages
Accessibility8688WordPress
Best Practices8987Flying Pages
SEO9491Flying Pages
Security7768Flying Pages
TTFB970ms458msWordPress
Composite8176Flying Pages
Performance
Flying Pages
56
WordPress
48
Accessibility
Flying Pages
86
WordPress
88
Security
Flying Pages
77
WordPress
68
SEO
Flying Pages
94
WordPress
91
Composite
Flying Pages
81
WordPress
76

Flying Pages outperforms WordPress in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 76). WordPress leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Flying Pages

Choose Flying Pages when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose WordPress

Choose WordPress when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 5 audited Flying Pages sites and 929 audited WordPress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Flying Pages or WordPress?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, Flying Pages or WordPress?
Flying Pages sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Flying Pages or WordPress?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor WordPress (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Flying Pages or WordPress?
Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Flying Pages or WordPress?
WordPress sites show lower Time to First Byte (458 ms vs 970 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Flying Pages or WordPress for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Flying Pages scores higher on overall composite score while Flying Pages may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback