Skip to content

Flying Pages vs WP Rocket

Based on 5 and 55 real audits

View Flying Pages details | View WP Rocket details
MetricFlying PagesWP RocketWinner
Performance5656Tie
Accessibility8687WP Rocket
Best Practices8989Tie
SEO9491Flying Pages
Security7771Flying Pages
TTFB970ms408msWP Rocket
Composite8179Flying Pages
Performance
Flying Pages
56
WP Rocket
56
Accessibility
Flying Pages
86
WP Rocket
87
Security
Flying Pages
77
WP Rocket
71
SEO
Flying Pages
94
WP Rocket
91
Composite
Flying Pages
81
WP Rocket
79

Flying Pages outperforms WP Rocket in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 79). WP Rocket leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Flying Pages

Choose Flying Pages when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose WP Rocket

Choose WP Rocket when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 5 audited Flying Pages sites and 55 audited WP Rocket sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Flying Pages or WP Rocket?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 56 on average).
Which has better security, Flying Pages or WP Rocket?
Flying Pages sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 71 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Flying Pages or WP Rocket?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor WP Rocket (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Flying Pages or WP Rocket?
Flying Pages sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Flying Pages or WP Rocket?
WP Rocket sites show lower Time to First Byte (408 ms vs 970 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Flying Pages or WP Rocket for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Flying Pages scores higher on overall composite score while Flying Pages may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback