Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Formidable Form

Based on 575 and 2 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Formidable Form details
MetricFont AwesomeFormidable FormWinner
Performance4441Font Awesome
Accessibility87100Formidable Form
Best Practices8781Font Awesome
SEO9192Formidable Form
Security6571Formidable Form
TTFB453ms248msFormidable Form
Composite7376Formidable Form
Performance
Font Awesome
44
Formidable Form
41
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Formidable Form
100
Security
Font Awesome
65
Formidable Form
71
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Formidable Form
92
Composite
Font Awesome
73
Formidable Form
76

Formidable Form outperforms Font Awesome in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Formidable Form

Choose Formidable Form when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 575 audited Font Awesome sites and 2 audited Formidable Form sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Formidable Form?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Formidable Form?
Formidable Form sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Formidable Form?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Formidable Form (100 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Formidable Form?
Formidable Form sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Formidable Form?
Formidable Form sites show lower Time to First Byte (248 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Formidable Form for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback