Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Hexo

Based on 575 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Hexo details
MetricFont AwesomeHexoWinner
Performance4488Hexo
Accessibility8762Font Awesome
Best Practices87100Hexo
SEO9192Hexo
Security6563Font Awesome
TTFB453ms149msHexo
Composite7377Hexo
Performance
Font Awesome
44
Hexo
88
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Hexo
62
Security
Font Awesome
65
Hexo
63
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Hexo
92
Composite
Font Awesome
73
Hexo
77

Hexo outperforms Font Awesome in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in accessibility, security.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Hexo

Choose Hexo when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 575 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited Hexo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Hexo?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Hexo sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (88 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Hexo?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Hexo?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (87 vs 62). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Hexo?
Hexo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Hexo?
Hexo sites show lower Time to First Byte (149 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Hexo for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Hexo scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback