Skip to content

Font Awesome vs HighLevel

Based on 575 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View HighLevel details
MetricFont AwesomeHighLevelWinner
Performance4453HighLevel
Accessibility8795HighLevel
Best Practices87100HighLevel
SEO91100HighLevel
Security6560Font Awesome
TTFB453ms28msHighLevel
Composite7374HighLevel
Performance
Font Awesome
44
HighLevel
53
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
HighLevel
95
Security
Font Awesome
65
HighLevel
60
SEO
Font Awesome
91
HighLevel
100
Composite
Font Awesome
73
HighLevel
74

HighLevel outperforms Font Awesome in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in security.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HighLevel

Choose HighLevel when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 575 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited HighLevel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or HighLevel?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HighLevel sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (53 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or HighLevel?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or HighLevel?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HighLevel (95 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or HighLevel?
HighLevel sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or HighLevel?
HighLevel sites show lower Time to First Byte (28 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or HighLevel for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HighLevel scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback