Skip to content

Font Awesome vs HTTP/3

Based on 37 and 243 real audits

MetricFont AwesomeHTTP/3Winner
Performance4241Font Awesome
Accessibility8489HTTP/3
Best Practices9186Font Awesome
SEO9292Tie
Security6567HTTP/3
TTFB391ms275msHTTP/3
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Font Awesome
42
HTTP/3
41
Accessibility
Font Awesome
84
HTTP/3
89
Security
Font Awesome
65
HTTP/3
67
SEO
Font Awesome
92
HTTP/3
92
Composite
Font Awesome
74
HTTP/3
74

HTTP/3 outperforms Font Awesome in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Font Awesome leads in performance, best practices.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or HTTP/3?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 41 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or HTTP/3?
HTTP/3 sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Should I choose Font Awesome or HTTP/3 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on performance while Font Awesome may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback