Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Kendo UI

Based on 663 and 5 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Kendo UI details
MetricFont AwesomeKendo UIWinner
Performance4626Font Awesome
Accessibility8689Kendo UI
Best Practices8885Font Awesome
SEO9190Font Awesome
Security6767Tie
TTFB478ms479msFont Awesome
Composite7473Font Awesome
Performance
Font Awesome
46
Kendo UI
26
Accessibility
Font Awesome
86
Kendo UI
89
Security
Font Awesome
67
Kendo UI
67
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Kendo UI
90
Composite
Font Awesome
74
Kendo UI
73

Font Awesome outperforms Kendo UI in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Kendo UI leads in accessibility.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Kendo UI

Choose Kendo UI when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 663 audited Font Awesome sites and 5 audited Kendo UI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Kendo UI (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Font Awesome sites show lower Time to First Byte (478 ms vs 479 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Kendo UI for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback