Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Kendo UI

Based on 559 and 4 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Kendo UI details
MetricFont AwesomeKendo UIWinner
Performance4431Font Awesome
Accessibility8792Kendo UI
Best Practices8788Kendo UI
SEO9188Font Awesome
Security6564Font Awesome
TTFB456ms209msKendo UI
Composite7372Font Awesome
Performance
Font Awesome
44
Kendo UI
31
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Kendo UI
92
Security
Font Awesome
65
Kendo UI
64
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Kendo UI
88
Composite
Font Awesome
73
Kendo UI
72

Font Awesome outperforms Kendo UI in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Kendo UI leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Kendo UI

Choose Kendo UI when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 559 audited Font Awesome sites and 4 audited Kendo UI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Kendo UI (92 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Kendo UI?
Kendo UI sites show lower Time to First Byte (209 ms vs 456 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Kendo UI for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback