Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Less

Based on 550 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Less details
MetricFont AwesomeLessWinner
Performance4457Less
Accessibility8794Less
Best Practices87100Less
SEO9161Font Awesome
Security6579Less
TTFB454ms1129msFont Awesome
Composite7381Less
Performance
Font Awesome
44
Less
57
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Less
94
Security
Font Awesome
65
Less
79
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Less
61
Composite
Font Awesome
73
Less
81

Less outperforms Font Awesome in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Less

Choose Less when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 550 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited Less sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Less?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Less sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Less?
Less sites score higher on security analysis (79 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Less?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Less (94 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Less?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 61 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Less?
Font Awesome sites show lower Time to First Byte (454 ms vs 1129 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Less for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Less scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback