Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Mixitup

Based on 641 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Mixitup details
MetricFont AwesomeMixitupWinner
Performance4630Font Awesome
Accessibility8690Mixitup
Best Practices88100Mixitup
SEO9192Mixitup
Security6768Mixitup
TTFB463ms455msMixitup
Composite7476Mixitup
Performance
Font Awesome
46
Mixitup
30
Accessibility
Font Awesome
86
Mixitup
90
Security
Font Awesome
67
Mixitup
68
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Mixitup
92
Composite
Font Awesome
74
Mixitup
76

Mixitup outperforms Font Awesome in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Font Awesome leads in performance.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Mixitup

Choose Mixitup when your primary concern is best practices and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 641 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited Mixitup sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Mixitup?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Mixitup?
Mixitup sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Mixitup?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mixitup (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Mixitup?
Mixitup sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Mixitup?
Mixitup sites show lower Time to First Byte (455 ms vs 463 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Mixitup for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback