Skip to content

Font Awesome vs mobile-detect.js

Based on 515 and 1 real audits

MetricFont Awesomemobile-detect.jsWinner
Performance4356mobile-detect.js
Accessibility8796mobile-detect.js
Best Practices8777Font Awesome
SEO9183Font Awesome
Security6466mobile-detect.js
TTFB439ms18msmobile-detect.js
Composite7372Font Awesome
Performance
Font Awesome
43
mobile-detect.js
56
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
mobile-detect.js
96
Security
Font Awesome
64
mobile-detect.js
66
SEO
Font Awesome
91
mobile-detect.js
83
Composite
Font Awesome
73
mobile-detect.js
72

mobile-detect.js outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in best practices, SEO, composite score.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or mobile-detect.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, mobile-detect.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or mobile-detect.js?
mobile-detect.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Should I choose Font Awesome or mobile-detect.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. mobile-detect.js scores higher on performance while Font Awesome may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback