Skip to content

Font Awesome vs mod_ssl

Based on 612 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View mod_ssl details
MetricFont Awesomemod_sslWinner
Performance4548mod_ssl
Accessibility8778Font Awesome
Best Practices8881Font Awesome
SEO9191Tie
Security6677mod_ssl
TTFB453ms293msmod_ssl
Composite7476mod_ssl
Performance
Font Awesome
45
mod_ssl
48
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
mod_ssl
78
Security
Font Awesome
66
mod_ssl
77
SEO
Font Awesome
91
mod_ssl
91
Composite
Font Awesome
74
mod_ssl
76

mod_ssl outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Font Awesome leads in accessibility, best practices.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose mod_ssl

Choose mod_ssl when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 612 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited mod_ssl sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or mod_ssl?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, mod_ssl sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or mod_ssl?
mod_ssl sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or mod_ssl?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (87 vs 78). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or mod_ssl?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or mod_ssl?
mod_ssl sites show lower Time to First Byte (293 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or mod_ssl for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. mod_ssl scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback