Skip to content

Font Awesome vs MooTools

Based on 575 and 2 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View MooTools details
MetricFont AwesomeMooToolsWinner
Performance4444Tie
Accessibility8778Font Awesome
Best Practices87100MooTools
SEO9188Font Awesome
Security6562Font Awesome
TTFB453ms175msMooTools
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Font Awesome
44
MooTools
44
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
MooTools
78
Security
Font Awesome
65
MooTools
62
SEO
Font Awesome
91
MooTools
88
Composite
Font Awesome
73
MooTools
73

Font Awesome outperforms MooTools in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). MooTools leads in best practices, TTFB.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose MooTools

Choose MooTools when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 575 audited Font Awesome sites and 2 audited MooTools sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or MooTools?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or MooTools?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or MooTools?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (87 vs 78). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or MooTools?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or MooTools?
MooTools sites show lower Time to First Byte (175 ms vs 453 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or MooTools for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback