Skip to content

Font Awesome vs Open Graph

Based on 730 and 4431 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View Open Graph details
MetricFont AwesomeOpen GraphWinner
Performance4650Open Graph
Accessibility8789Open Graph
Best Practices8989Tie
SEO9193Open Graph
Security6870Open Graph
TTFB486ms430msOpen Graph
Composite7577Open Graph
Performance
Font Awesome
46
Open Graph
50
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
Open Graph
89
Security
Font Awesome
68
Open Graph
70
SEO
Font Awesome
91
Open Graph
93
Composite
Font Awesome
75
Open Graph
77

Open Graph outperforms Font Awesome in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Font Awesome leads in no categories.

When to choose Font Awesome

Font Awesome doesn't clearly lead Open Graph in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 730 audited Font Awesome sites and 4431 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites show lower Time to First Byte (430 ms vs 486 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback