Based on 725 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Font Awesome | OpenCart | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 45 | Font Awesome |
| Accessibility | 87 | 75 | Font Awesome |
| Best Practices | 89 | 100 | OpenCart |
| SEO | 91 | 83 | Font Awesome |
| Security | 68 | 75 | OpenCart |
| TTFB | 486ms | 1098ms | Font Awesome |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | OpenCart |
Font Awesome outperforms OpenCart in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 77). OpenCart leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose OpenCart when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 725 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited OpenCart sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback