Skip to content

Font Awesome vs OWL Carousel

Based on 756 and 92 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View OWL Carousel details
MetricFont AwesomeOWL CarouselWinner
Performance4644Font Awesome
Accessibility8783Font Awesome
Best Practices8988Font Awesome
SEO9190Font Awesome
Security6969Tie
TTFB539ms474msOWL Carousel
Composite7575Tie
Performance
Font Awesome
46
OWL Carousel
44
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
OWL Carousel
83
Security
Font Awesome
69
OWL Carousel
69
SEO
Font Awesome
91
OWL Carousel
90
Composite
Font Awesome
75
OWL Carousel
75

Font Awesome outperforms OWL Carousel in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). OWL Carousel leads in TTFB.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose OWL Carousel

Choose OWL Carousel when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 756 audited Font Awesome sites and 92 audited OWL Carousel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or OWL Carousel?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 44 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or OWL Carousel?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (69 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or OWL Carousel?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Font Awesome (87 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or OWL Carousel?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or OWL Carousel?
OWL Carousel sites show lower Time to First Byte (474 ms vs 539 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or OWL Carousel for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback