Skip to content

Font Awesome vs PHP

Based on 515 and 948 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View PHP details
MetricFont AwesomePHPWinner
Performance4346PHP
Accessibility8789PHP
Best Practices8787Tie
SEO9191Tie
Security6464Tie
TTFB439ms381msPHP
Composite7374PHP
Performance
Font Awesome
43
PHP
46
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
PHP
89
Security
Font Awesome
64
PHP
64
SEO
Font Awesome
91
PHP
91
Composite
Font Awesome
73
PHP
74

PHP outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Font Awesome leads in no categories.

When to choose Font Awesome

Font Awesome doesn't clearly lead PHP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 515 audited Font Awesome sites and 948 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or PHP?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or PHP?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (381 ms vs 439 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback