Skip to content

Font Awesome vs PHP

Based on 811 and 1540 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View PHP details
MetricFont AwesomePHPWinner
Performance4750PHP
Accessibility8788PHP
Best Practices8989Tie
SEO9191Tie
Security6970PHP
TTFB537ms632msFont Awesome
Composite7677PHP
Performance
Font Awesome
47
PHP
50
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
PHP
88
Security
Font Awesome
69
PHP
70
SEO
Font Awesome
91
PHP
91
Composite
Font Awesome
76
PHP
77

PHP outperforms Font Awesome in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 76). Font Awesome leads in TTFB.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 811 audited Font Awesome sites and 1540 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or PHP?
Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or PHP?
Font Awesome sites show lower Time to First Byte (537 ms vs 632 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback