Skip to content

Font Awesome vs plentymarkets

Based on 639 and 1 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View plentymarkets details
MetricFont AwesomeplentymarketsWinner
Performance4638Font Awesome
Accessibility8698plentymarkets
Best Practices88100plentymarkets
SEO9192plentymarkets
Security6781plentymarkets
TTFB461ms246msplentymarkets
Composite7482plentymarkets
Performance
Font Awesome
46
plentymarkets
38
Accessibility
Font Awesome
86
plentymarkets
98
Security
Font Awesome
67
plentymarkets
81
SEO
Font Awesome
91
plentymarkets
92
Composite
Font Awesome
74
plentymarkets
82

plentymarkets outperforms Font Awesome in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (82 vs 74). Font Awesome leads in performance.

When to choose Font Awesome

Choose Font Awesome when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose plentymarkets

Choose plentymarkets when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 639 audited Font Awesome sites and 1 audited plentymarkets sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or plentymarkets?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Font Awesome sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or plentymarkets?
plentymarkets sites score higher on security analysis (81 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Font Awesome or plentymarkets?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor plentymarkets (98 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Font Awesome or plentymarkets?
plentymarkets sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Font Awesome or plentymarkets?
plentymarkets sites show lower Time to First Byte (246 ms vs 461 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Font Awesome or plentymarkets for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Font Awesome scores higher on overall composite score while Font Awesome may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback