Skip to content

Font Awesome vs prettyPhoto

Based on 515 and 3 real audits

View Font Awesome details | View prettyPhoto details
MetricFont AwesomeprettyPhotoWinner
Performance4344prettyPhoto
Accessibility8789prettyPhoto
Best Practices8789prettyPhoto
SEO9190Font Awesome
Security6459Font Awesome
TTFB439ms635msFont Awesome
Composite7371Font Awesome
Performance
Font Awesome
43
prettyPhoto
44
Accessibility
Font Awesome
87
prettyPhoto
89
Security
Font Awesome
64
prettyPhoto
59
SEO
Font Awesome
91
prettyPhoto
90
Composite
Font Awesome
73
prettyPhoto
71

Font Awesome outperforms prettyPhoto in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). prettyPhoto leads in performance, accessibility, best practices.

FAQ

Which is faster, Font Awesome or prettyPhoto?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, prettyPhoto sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Font Awesome or prettyPhoto?
Font Awesome sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 59 on average).
Should I choose Font Awesome or prettyPhoto for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. prettyPhoto scores higher on performance while Font Awesome may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback